«

»

May 11

A Quranist’s Response to the Term Hadith Rejector

What does it mean to “reject”?
[v. ri-jekt; n. ree-jekt] –verb (used with object)

1. to refuse to have, take, recognize, etc.: to reject the offer of a better job.
2. to refuse to grant (a request, demand, etc.).
3. to refuse to accept (someone or something); rebuff: The other children rejected him. The publisher rejected the author’s latest novel.

What does it mean to “Reject Hadith” or to be labelled as a “Hadith Rejector”?
Quranists are often labelled as “Rejectors of Hadith”. It has a derogatory connotation that to “Reject Hadith” is to be a “kafir” or a non-believer in God’s commands and to be non-supportive of the Messenger of God. Calling someone a “Hadith Rejector” seems to imply that they are somehow “disobedient” to the Messenger and to God. Sadly, quite often, the term “Hadith Rejector” is used as a synonym for non-muslim.

This piece will hopefully show InshaaAllah why the terms “Hadith Rejection” and “Hadith Rejector” need to be clarified. The terms do not necessarily have to imply negative connotations. It is however important to clarify what it is that Quranists DO reject.

Quranist Beliefs
Quranists believe that the Quran is the sole source of Divine Guidance. Quranists believe that upholding the Quran is the best way to obey the Messenger and obey God. Some people think that obeying God is adhering to the Quran whereas obeying the Messenger is following Ahadith collections. Upon closer inspection, 73:16 shows that fa’aṣā fir’’awnu l-rasūla – Firawn disobeyed the Messenger. It stands to reason that obeying the Messenger and obeying God are one in the same. It is clear that obeying/disobeying the Messenger is nothing to do with Ahadith collections which came centuries after the Quran. For a comprehensive understanding of the Quran as the Sole Authority, please see  The Authority of the Quran by Kashif Ahmed Shehzada and further reading on “Obeying the Messenger” in this article.

Anything other than the Quran – anything:  Ahadith collections, man’s own words, scholarly texts, books, essays, articles, opinions of other Quran students, hearsay, old wives tales, traditional understandings, cultural beliefs, societal norms and customs, manners and behaviour can be investigated, pondered and compared with what the Quran says, and we are encouraged by the Quran to use logic and reason to analyse anything and everything. What we might find is that some of these extra-Quranic sources DO correspond with our understanding of the Quran OR they might be good advice or good practices in general day to day life OR they may be detrimental; detrimental to society and our own spiritual growth.

To reject or not to reject?
It is not logical to say that if some good advice, wherever it is from – an Ahadith collection or teachers, friends, family or strangers – is to be automatically rejected, purely because it is not from the Quran. Its claim to have the authority of Divine Guidance is rejected of course by Quranists, as we believe only God’s Words in the Quran have such a status. BUT if there is merit in the good advice and it corresponds to achieving the goals of what we are trying to achieve in life in the way of God, then there is no reason or logic to reject purely for the sake of rejection.

The detrimental “advice” or customs and practices which have little to no benefit in society or for ones own soul or spiritual development, and which directly contradict the teachings of the Quran, then it is these that Quranists may be found scrutinising and wholeheartedly rejecting.

No extra-Quranic prohibition 
The Quran tells us what is forbidden. What is not specifically mentioned as forbidden is lawful. The Quran emphasises that we must not say things are forbidden if Allah has not forbidden them. Therefore if a “Hadith” says something is forbidden where the Qur’an does not back this up, then that is a good example of rejection of the authority of the prohibition. This in no way means that we reject the Messenger’s authority. It is the claim that the hadith has its origin with God that is rejected.

Suggestions
I think it is a noble gesture to urge fellow believers to the path of God. There are undoubtedly some “hadiths” which are very good advice and give us food for thought and suggestions on how to become better muslims, especially ones that have their basis in the Quran anyway. Suggestions of how to be kind to parents and family and to benefit one’s community, and to fight against injustice and oppression are welcomed as part of achieving the goals. The question is: do these suggestions of how to achieve the goals have any divine authority? No. Allah provides the best examples in the Quran through His prophets and messengers. See Prophetic Examples in the Quran.

What it boils down to
In light of all this this, “Hadith Rejector” as a synonym for Quranist does not really do justice to what it is that Quranists actually DO reject. We reject the concept of a second source of Divine Guidance. We reject the notion of any Religious Authority. Mullahs, Sheikhs, Scholars, Priests and Imams cannot act as “middle-men” between the reader of the Quran and God. The Qur’an says to judge by the Scripture. If people want to give advice, and there is wisdom in the advice…great! If it contradicts the Quran it’s not good advice.

Rejecting what’s right is wrong. Rejecting what’s wrong is right! There are many immoral practices we reject: dogma, oppression, injustice, inequality, unfairness, distorting the words of the Scripture, corruption, falsehood, lying about Allah, the Quran rejects these and so do we.

Traits shown to be disliked by Allah such as self-conceit, boastfulness, corruption, exultation, betrayal, ingratitude, treachery, transgression, evil and wickedness, aggression, bad manners: we reject all these (as I am sure most people including other Muslims do too) and the Quran specifically mentions them. The Quran references are listed on the post entitled Personality Traits disliked

The deeds and behaviour of the Firawn detailed in the Quran has shown what is not acceptable: Killing, shaming, corruption, murder, arrogance, criminal, wickedness, prejudice, dispicable behavior, rejecting / disbelieving the Prophets and Messengers, oppression, building Kingdoms, persecution, tyranny, misguiding others from the path, hatred, transgression, wrong-doings, false accusations, slander, defaming, calling the Prophet a liar, evil, scheming, bad treatment of family / wife, disobedience to Allah and His Prophets / Messengers   The Quran references are listed here on the Firawn study

Rejection is only negative if we are rejecting the good when we should be rejecting the bad.
InshaaAllah, We reject what the Quran tells us to reject. We uphold what the Quran tells us to uphold. And we urge others to do the same. InshaaAllah.

Please leave a comment below, or discuss on the FaceBook discussion group or on the forum.

Further reading: Who is a Kaafir? by Kashif Shehzada

5 comments

5 pings

Skip to comment form

  1. TruthBehindIt

    Salam and Peace!

    A really intelligent point in the above article that clears the meaning of "Obeying the Messenger."

    —–"We sent to Pharaoh a Messenger (Musa). But Pharaoh disobeyed the Messenger." (73: 15,16)

    Did Messenger Musa took his ahadith to Pharaoh that he disobeyed and refused to accept???—–No!—Messenger Musa had with him only and only Allah's Revelation.

    And disobeying the Messenger clearly means, rejecting The Revelation that the Messenger Musa brought to Pharaoh.

    And who obeyed the Messenger Musa, they accepted The Revelation that Musa brought to them.

    People of Makkah who disobeyed the Messenger Muhammad, did they reject his ahadith???

    And who obeyed the Messenger Muhammad, did they accept the ahadith of the Messenger???

    No!—They didn't accept or reject his ahadith.—-Those who obeyed, accepted The Revelation.—And those who disobeyed, rejected The Revelation.

    1. Asfora

      Walaikum salam TBI – thanks for your comments :)

    2. Bakari Zaki Tajuddin

      As salaamu Alaikum,

      Excellent Examples……..Well Stated.

  2. immy

    does it mention in the Quran to beat your wife? but does it also mention that to beat a woman is haraam? so if both views are in the Quran how do we know where we stand? surely ahadith are needed to clear matters like these. also to be a quranist surely you must be fluent in arabic as the Quran was revealed in arabic and till this day you cannot get a COPY of the Quran in any other language but translations which all Muslims know well that they hold many many errors for words and even sentences cannot be clearly translated.

    1. Asfora

      there is a site dedicated to 4:34 http://wifebeatingislam.wordpress.com/

  1. “Quran Alone-ism” and Quranism « Quranist Voices – Musings on Being Quranist

    [...] “Quranic muslims” and “Quranists” are labelled indiscriminately as “Hadith Rejectors” (see Quranist’s response to this term) by those who disagree with the premise that the Quran can be understood without the acceptance of [...]

  2. “Quran Alone-ism” and Quranism

    [...] « A Quranist’s Response to the Term Hadith Rejector [...]

  3. Jumping to conclusions « Quranist Voices – Musings on Being Quranist

    [...] personal understanding of the text. Please also see “A Quranists response to the term ‘Hadith Rejection‘ ” for more [...]

  4. Criticism of Quranists « Quranist Voices – Musings on Being Quranist

    [...]  A Quranist’s Response to the term “Hadith Rejector” [...]

Leave a Reply